Episodic Conflicts in "I Love Lucy"

Sitcoms (a shortened way of saying a "situation comedy"), as opposed to sketch and stand up comedy, are usually centered around a specific set of characters in an on-going storyline. The comedy comes from the characters' actions in certain situations. Often, each episode of a sitcom will have something happen to the characters that gets resolved by the end of the show. This post will deal with episodic conflicts in sitcoms, using "I Love Lucy" as an example.

"I Love Lucy" is a sitcom about a Cuban singer/bandleader (Ricky) and his American wife (Lucy) who often goes out of her way to get into show business. Fans of the series know that most episodes are about Ricky doing something and Lucy wanting to be a part of it (but not being allowed to by Ricky). Lucy then tries to think of a way to sneak in to whatever Ricky's doing, but the plan manages to fall apart along the way, with humorous consequences. By the end of the episode the conflict is resolved (but often not how Lucy wanted).

One famous episode was titled "Job Switching". The story goes that Ricky and his friend Fred think that housework is easier than actually having a job. Lucy and Ethel (Fred's wife and Lucy's friend) think otherwise. Each group trades places for the day and it is then that we find Lucy and Ethel in an iconic scene at a candy factory. The women wrap candies, thinking the work was relatively simple, until the coveyer belt the candies are on starts to speed up, leaving them overwhelmed. Not wanting to far behind, Lucy and Ethel eat and hide candies in order not to have them pass unwrapped. Meanwhile, the men try to cook dinner, but end up making a huge mess in the kitchen. In the end both groups have changed their minds about work after going through some embarassing mishaps, and the status quo returns to normal.



Lucy (left) and Ethel (right) are having some trouble...

 The formula for these conflicts is as such: conflict affects character(s), character attempts to resolve conflict, conflict ends before credits roll, with "I Love Lucy" as a fine example of sitcom antics.

Shots in Filmmaking as used in RENT

The size of a subject in a frame can have an effect on the audience as far as how the scene is interpreted or setting the emotional background of a scene. Through the use of long shots, medium shots, and close ups, a story can have more impact on the viewers. Using the musical film "RENT", I'll be giving an example of the impacts of certain shots.

As Christmas comes closer, residents of these apartment complexes have come to find that they are threatened with eviction unless they pay all of last year's rent, which they were previously promised they wouldn't have to pay. In outrage, they begin to protest. This long shot gives the viewer a view of the whole neighborhood. Details include decorations that are hung in preparation for the holiday season that give clues to the date, along with the chaos of fires being started by angry tenants.

Benny (left) turns out to be the one behind the eviction notices. Mark (middle) and Roger (right) confront him about it. A medium shot can provide insight on characters' relationships with one another. While Benny explains the situation, he does not look directly at them while talking, giving off an air of superiority. Mark and Roger, who are farther back in the frame, are merely spectators in the conversation.

Roger reflects on his frustration on not being able to write a good song and the death of his girlfriend. Close ups like this are often used as reaction shots. They provide a glance at a character's emotional state. Even though Christmas draws near, Roger can't do anything but sit in grief for his current situation.

Those are examples of the three basic shots used in cinema. Images are taken from "RENT" which was written by Johnathon Larson and produced by Chris Columbus for Columbia Pictures.

The Studio System and Its Effect on Hollywood

The studio system, through its use of vertical integration, has managed to flood Hollywood with films from many of the top production studios. These films often featured stars that that perticular studio has under contract, usually long-term. It was often these stars that led to the decision to make certain kinds of films, based on their personal strengths in acting.

For example, actors who could sing would often star in musicals, dancers often got a dance number in the middle of a film, comedians would often have a chance to crack a joke, and so on. Some actors had certain personality traits, which would be reoccuring in the characters they play (although nowadays we would call that "typecasting"). Films were made around the actors, rather than just having an actor be part of the film.

Lon Chaney, Sr. had the ability to change his character using make-up techniques that he invented, giving him the nickname "the man of a thousand faces". This led to him starring in silent horror films such as "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" and "The Phantom of the Opera". These films were notable in that Chaney was able to pose as seriously deformed characters who still managed to be sympathetic considering their circumstances. Though Chaney's talents went beyond horror and stage makeup, he made his greatest impact in horror films made by Universal Studios.

Lon Chaney, Sr. "The man of a thousand faces"

All in the Family vs. Full House

“All in the Family” and “Full House”, though technically in the same genre, come from two very different eras, which is apparent in the issues mentioned within each series. “All in the Family” is set in the 1970s, while “Full House” takes place in the 1980s-1990s. The cast dynamics are also noticeably different: “All in the Family” stars an older couple, their adult daughter and her husband who live with them in Queens, New York, while “Full House” stars a single father raising his three young daughters with the help of his friend and brother-in-law in their home in San Francisco.

Even with these differences, both series feature characters dealing with relevant issues that occur in their lives. Both series have dealt with people having conflicts with each other due to personal differences. It can also be noted that both families live outside of a typical nuclear family structure, which usually consists of a father, mother, and their children in one household.

One noticeable difference in the issues dealt with in these series is the fact that “All in the Family” deals with more serious issues such as Archie’s bigotry towards people of color and homosexuals. Meanwhile, “Full House” has addressed more social problems such as child abuse and drunk driving. This may be simply because of a change in personal values between people living in these time periods, where in more recent times it has become less acceptable to discriminate people on the basis of skin color or sexual orientation.

Both of these series do, however, reflect on the history of their respective eras. They provide insight into social dynamics and the values of people in those times. Through these series we can reflect upon how times have changed, and take note of the status of our society today.

Audience Demand and the Radio Industry

The power of audience demand has left a huge impact on the radio industry. The desire for entertainment and information from those with radios at home led to the evolution of radio and its purpose.

Audience demand is basically what the entertainment uses to appeal to their target demographic. If the audience doesn't enjoy what is presented to them, they'll stop watching/listening. Even after the age of radio, this plays a major role in the televison and film industry as well. Without an audience, there's no profit to be made, so entertainers have to keep the viewers/listeners interested.

In the 1920s-1930s, people used radios as solace during the poor economic times. As noted in "Media Now", radio was not just centered around music, but also featured news, dramas, and stories of various genres that appealed to a wide variety of people. These shows became more and more popular, which drew attention from companies who wanted to use radio for advertising. Without an active audience, radio would not have become as successful as it has, and without radio, there would have been nothing to start the development of TV and internet radio.

Social Learning & Teen Pregnancy

Today, I’ll be explaining social learning and the effects it has on teen pregnancy rates.

The social learning theory states that people learn behaviors by observing others. For example, a study by Albert Bandura demonstrated that children imitate violent behaviors that they learn by watching adults perform them. In today’s society, the glamorization of teen pregnancy in media may be encouraging teenage girls to have children themselves.

Researchers have proven that teens exposed to the most sexual content on TV are twice as likely as teens watching less of this material to become pregnant before they reach age 20. During the pregnancy of Jamie Lynn Spears, birth control is never mentioned. Dealing with pregnancy is often taken lightly by the media; the film Juno, while otherwise being very straightforward about risks in having sex, takes the issue of giving children up for adoption lightly, making it seem like a simple solution without taking note of the emotional impact it has on teen mothers. Media that features teen pregnancy often opt for happy endings, such as the couple staying together to raise the child, when in fact this rarely is the case in real life. Teenage women who watch these sort of films make the connection that there are few negative consequences of getting pregnant, and through social learning become a statistic by imitating these behaviors.

Sex on TV Increases Teen Pregnancy, Says Report
What's Missing From Teen Pregnancy in TV, Film

Framing as used by FOX News

Fox News is an example of framing by the media. They present news as interpreted by those in the network.


Framing involves manipulating media to create associations with the issue or person mentioned. In the news, how a story is presented can have an effect on the audience. For example: on the subject of government spending, referring to the money that’s being used as “taxpayer dollars” as opposed to “government funds” gives citizens the frame of mind that they can influence government policies since they pay taxes. Meanwhile, simply referring it as “government funds” creates an impersonal connection to the government from the audience.

When Fox News presents a story, sometimes important information about the story is left out. When Sean Hannity reported on one of Obama’s speeches, he reported that many seats were empty before Obama’s speech began, but he never mentioned that the speech was an invitation-only event and only about 5% of those invited were absent. This is an obvious attempt to make Obama seem unpopular to Americans. Also, in the video of the speech Obama is quoted as saying “taxes are scheduled to go up substantially next year -- for everybody”, but the truth was the quote was deliberately cut off to make it seem that he planned the tax hike. What Obama really said was “Under the tax plan passed by the [Bush] administration, taxes are scheduled to go up substantially next year -- for everybody.” This was a blatant attempt by Fox News to portray Obama in a negative light.

Video on Fox News
Obama's actual speech
Information on the Event